61.14 (1)(b)
(1) The court may reduce or terminate an award of alimony
upon specific written findings by the court that since the granting of
a divorce and the award of alimony a supportive relationship has existed
between the obligee and a person with whom the obligee resides. On the
issue of whether alimony should be reduced or terminated under this paragraph,
the burden is on the obligor to prove by a preponderance of the evidence
that a supportive relationship exists.
(2) In determining whether an existing award of alimony
should be reduced or terminated because of an alleged supportive relationship
between an obligee and a person who is not related by consanguinity or
affinity and with whom the obligee resides, the court shall elicit the
nature and extent of the relationship in question. The court shall give
consideration, without limitation, to circumstances, including, but not
limited to, the following, in determining the relationship of an obligee
to another person:
a. The extent to which the obligee and the other person
have held themselves out as a married couple by engaging in conduct such
as using the same last name, using a common mailing address, referring
to each other in terms such as "my husband" or "my wife,"
or otherwise conducting themselves in a manner that evidences a permanent
supportive relationship.
b. The period of time that the obligee has resided with
the other person in a permanent place of abode.
c. The extent to which the obligee and the other person
have pooled their assets or income or otherwise exhibited financial interdependence.
d. The extent to which the obligee or the other person has
supported the other, in whole or in part.
e. The extent to which the obligee or the other person has
performed valuable services for the other.
f. The extent to which the obligee or the other person has
performed valuable services for the other's company or employer.
g. Whether the obligee and the other person have worked
together to create or enhance anything of value.
h. Whether the obligee and the other person have jointly
contributed to the purchase of any real or personal property.
i. Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and the
other person have an express agreement regarding property sharing or support.
j. Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and
the other person have an implied agreement regarding property sharing or
support.
k. Whether the obligee and the other person have provided
support to the children of one another, regardless of any legal duty to
do so.
(3) This paragraph does not abrogate the requirement that
every marriage in this state be solemnized under a license, does not recognize
a common law marriage as valid, and does not recognize a de facto marriage.
This paragraph recognizes only that relationships do exist that provide
economic support equivalent to a marriage and that alimony terminable on
remarriage may be reduced or terminated upon the establishment of equivalent
equitable circumstances as described in this paragraph. The existence of
a conjugal relationship, though it may be relevant to the nature and extent
of the relationship, is not necessary for the application of the provisions
of this paragraph.